Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
blooper_threat [2017/07/20 10:25] – created Carlos Pedrazablooper_threat [2017/07/20 23:41] (current) – [Off the Record?] edit to tighten Carlos Pedraza
Line 9: Line 9:
 //**__ __**// <wrap lo>**By [[user>cpedraza|Carlos Pedraza]]**</wrap> //**__ __**// <wrap lo>**By [[user>cpedraza|Carlos Pedraza]]**</wrap>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +
 +<wrap lo>//See also: [[prelude_actors_bloopers|Actors Cast Doubt on Axanar Threat Over Blooper Reel]]//</wrap>
  
 A promised blooper reel taken from footage shot for //Prelude to Axanar// prompted producer [[Alec Peters]] to threaten legal action against his former chief technologist, [[Terry McIntosh]], claiming he's protecting the image of the veteran Star Trek and scifi actors who appeared in the Axanar short. A promised blooper reel taken from footage shot for //Prelude to Axanar// prompted producer [[Alec Peters]] to threaten legal action against his former chief technologist, [[Terry McIntosh]], claiming he's protecting the image of the veteran Star Trek and scifi actors who appeared in the Axanar short.
Line 14: Line 16:
 ===== Legal Issues ===== ===== Legal Issues =====
  
-In an email to **AxaMonitor** editor Carlos Pedraza with the subject line "Legal Issues," Peters said he had informed the agents for the [[cast|professional actors]] who appeared in //Prelude//, as well as their union, the Screen Actors Guild/AFTRA, that McIntosh planned to release footage featuring the cast without their permission.+In a July 15, 2017, email to **AxaMonitor** editor Carlos Pedraza with the subject line "Legal Issues," Peters said he had informed the agents for the [[cast|professional actors]] who appeared in //Prelude//, as well as their union, the Screen Actors Guild/AFTRA, that McIntosh planned to release footage featuring the cast without their permission.
  
 McIntosh defiantly rejected those claims and encouraged legal action. McIntosh defiantly rejected those claims and encouraged legal action.
Line 52: Line 54:
 Peters did not explain why **AxaMonitor** would be included in any legal action since the blooper reel is solely McIntosh's project. In an email reply to Peters, Pedraza wrote: Peters did not explain why **AxaMonitor** would be included in any legal action since the blooper reel is solely McIntosh's project. In an email reply to Peters, Pedraza wrote:
  
->  I am not a party to whatever issue you have with Terry McIntosh's intention to publish a Prelude blooper reel. So threatening action against me is irrelevant. Nor is it appropriate for me to serve as some kind of intermediary in whatever legal tussle you're seeking to foment with him. You have his contact information; I suggest you communicate with him directly.((Carlos Pedraza email to Alec Peters, 7/19/17.))+>  I am not a party to whatever issue you have with Terry McIntosh's intention to publish a //Prelude// blooper reel. So threatening action against me is irrelevant. Nor is it appropriate for me to serve as some kind of intermediary in whatever legal tussle you're seeking to foment with him. You have his contact information; I suggest you communicate with him directly.((Carlos Pedraza email to Alec Peters, 7/19/17.))
  
 == McIntosh: Peters' Email 'Cowardly' == == McIntosh: Peters' Email 'Cowardly' ==
Line 115: Line 117:
 In his email reply to Peters, **AxaMonitor**'s editor reminded Peters: "What you've written in an unsolicited email to a reporter isn't subject to whatever 'off the record' claims you assert. Off the record communications with a reporter require an agreement by both parties. … You and I have no confidentiality agreement in place; therefore, I consider your communication with me very much on the record and reportable."((Carlos Pedraza email to Alec Peters, 7/19/17.)) In his email reply to Peters, **AxaMonitor**'s editor reminded Peters: "What you've written in an unsolicited email to a reporter isn't subject to whatever 'off the record' claims you assert. Off the record communications with a reporter require an agreement by both parties. … You and I have no confidentiality agreement in place; therefore, I consider your communication with me very much on the record and reportable."((Carlos Pedraza email to Alec Peters, 7/19/17.))
  
-McIntosh chose not to read Peters' entire email to **AxaMonitor**, encouraging Pedraza to make the contact public:+McIntosh chose not to read Peters' entire email to **AxaMonitor**, and he encouraged Pedraza to make Peters' email public:
  
 > Be public about every contact that he attempts.  Exposing his nonsense publicly at every opportunity is the only way to go, IMHO, so that it's documented and helps those that are interested (on either side of the aisle) connect the long list of dots that are this debacle.((Terry McIntosh Facebook Messenger post to AxaMonitor editor Carlos Pedraza, 7/20/17.)) {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}} > Be public about every contact that he attempts.  Exposing his nonsense publicly at every opportunity is the only way to go, IMHO, so that it's documented and helps those that are interested (on either side of the aisle) connect the long list of dots that are this debacle.((Terry McIntosh Facebook Messenger post to AxaMonitor editor Carlos Pedraza, 7/20/17.)) {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}}
 +
 +<WRAP tip 75%>
 +<wrap em>COMMENTS</wrap> \\
 +Discuss this article in [[face>groups/axamonitor/permalink/250260778822110/|AxaMonitor's Facebook group]].
 +</WRAP>
  
 ---- ----
 **Keywords** {{tag>Terry_McIntosh Alec_Peters legal Prelude}} **Keywords** {{tag>Terry_McIntosh Alec_Peters legal Prelude}}