Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
does [2016/06/09 01:35] – edits for clarity Carlos Pedrazadoes [2018/11/06 22:35] (current) – [The Does] Carlos Pedraza
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 <WRAP round important> <WRAP round important>
-<wrap em>UPDATE</wrap> According to the court's May 10, 2016, scheduling order, both sides had until May 25 to "to join other parties or to amend the pleadings" in the case. That date passed with none of the Does named.+<fs smaller><wrap em>UPDATE</wrap> According to the court's May 10, 2016, scheduling order, both sides had until May 25 to "to join other parties or to amend the pleadings" in the case. That date passed with none of the Does named.</fs>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +
 +==== Why Weren't Any Does Named? ====
  
 <WRAP right round info 50%> <WRAP right round info 50%>
 <wrap lo>This section, **Why Weren't Any Does Named?** features opinion and informed speculation.</wrap></WRAP> <wrap lo>This section, **Why Weren't Any Does Named?** features opinion and informed speculation.</wrap></WRAP>
- 
-==== Why Weren't Any Does Named? ==== 
  
 In their May 2, 2016, [[joint statement]] to the judge ahead of the case's [[scheduling conference]], both sides indicated a reluctance to adding parties to the suit.((Rule 26 Joint Report by Plaintiffs and Defendants, p. 2 line 12.)) In their May 2, 2016, [[joint statement]] to the judge ahead of the case's [[scheduling conference]], both sides indicated a reluctance to adding parties to the suit.((Rule 26 Joint Report by Plaintiffs and Defendants, p. 2 line 12.))