Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
financial_review_findings [2017/01/16 05:09] Carlos Pedrazafinancial_review_findings [2018/10/23 15:43] (current) – [Committee Setup] added tahg Carlos Pedraza
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 Amid questions about the independence of Axanar's financial review committee following the [[financial_review_committee|resignation]] of one of its members, the review may also be fundamentally flawed by the fact the committee examined only part of Axanar's books. Amid questions about the independence of Axanar's financial review committee following the [[financial_review_committee|resignation]] of one of its members, the review may also be fundamentally flawed by the fact the committee examined only part of Axanar's books.
 +
 +<wrap lo>//See also: [[bailey_committee#New Financial Reviewer's Independence]]//</wrap>
 +
  
 ===== 'No Shenanigans' ===== ===== 'No Shenanigans' =====
Line 58: Line 61:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-Left unspoken in Peters charge was that Axanar's other financial activity — including Peters' supposed $150,000 "donation" — would remain shrouded. In practical terms, that meant the committee only ever examined the portions of Axanar's finances that Peters himself had selected:+Left unspoken in Peterscharge to reviewers was that Axanar's other financial activity — including Peters' supposed $150,000 "donation" — would remain shrouded. In practical terms, that meant the committee only ever examined the portions of Axanar's finances that Peters himself had selected:
  
 >  The donor financials are a subset of the overall financials. The overall financials represent every dollar spent on Axanar Productions, which includes the more than $150,000 I have put into this production.  Those [overall financials] are the financials that go to the CPA for taxes.  The committee reviews [only] the donor financials.(([[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/01/13/alec-peters-discusses-axanars-financials-and-his-review-committee-interview/|"Alec Peters Discusses Axanar's Financials and His Review Committee!"]] Fan Film Factor blog, 1/13/17.)) >  The donor financials are a subset of the overall financials. The overall financials represent every dollar spent on Axanar Productions, which includes the more than $150,000 I have put into this production.  Those [overall financials] are the financials that go to the CPA for taxes.  The committee reviews [only] the donor financials.(([[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/01/13/alec-peters-discusses-axanars-financials-and-his-review-committee-interview/|"Alec Peters Discusses Axanar's Financials and His Review Committee!"]] Fan Film Factor blog, 1/13/17.))
Line 87: Line 90:
 == Defining Independence == == Defining Independence ==
  
-While Peters himself said he defined 'independent' merely as 'not employed by Axanar Productions.'((Alec Peters comment on [[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/01/13/alec-peters-discusses-axanars-financials-and-his-review-committee-interview/#comment-4362|“Alec Peters Discusses Axanar’s Financials and his Review Committee! (Interview)”]], Fan Film Factor blog, 1/13/17.))+While Peters himself said he defined 'independent' merely as 'not employed by Axanar Productions,'((Alec Peters comment on [[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/01/13/alec-peters-discusses-axanars-financials-and-his-review-committee-interview/#comment-4362|“Alec Peters Discusses Axanar’s Financials and his Review Committee! (Interview)”]], Fan Film Factor blog, 1/13/17.)) in the corporate world, the independence of those conducting audits is defined a bit more broadly than for Axanar: "Not related in any way to the person or firm undergoing the audit."(([[http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Independent+Audit|The Free Dictionary]], retrieved 1/16/17.))
  
 <WRAP right round important 50%> <WRAP right round important 50%>
 <wrap lo><wrap em>DISCLOSURE</wrap> Rubio and **AxaMonitor**'s Carlos Pedraza collaborated for a short time on the //Star Trek New Voyages// episode, "Enemy Starfleet," shot in 2008. Rubio resigned as director of the episode; Pedraza was first assistant director.</wrap> <wrap lo><wrap em>DISCLOSURE</wrap> Rubio and **AxaMonitor**'s Carlos Pedraza collaborated for a short time on the //Star Trek New Voyages// episode, "Enemy Starfleet," shot in 2008. Rubio resigned as director of the episode; Pedraza was first assistant director.</wrap>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
- 
-In the corporate world, the independence of those conducting audits is defined a bit more broadly than Peters did, as "not related in any way to the person or firm undergoing the audit."(([[http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Independent+Audit|The Free Dictionary]], retrieved 1/16/17.)) 
  
 In fact, in his announcement of Santiago's departure, Peters emphasized that his replacement would be "another long term Axanar team member, who has … an intimate knowledge of Axanar."(([[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/01/13/alec-peters-discusses-axanars-financials-and-his-review-committee-interview/|"Alec Peters Discusses Axanar's Financials and His Review Committee!"]] Fan Film Factor blog, 1/13/17.)) In fact, in his announcement of Santiago's departure, Peters emphasized that his replacement would be "another long term Axanar team member, who has … an intimate knowledge of Axanar."(([[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/01/13/alec-peters-discusses-axanars-financials-and-his-review-committee-interview/|"Alec Peters Discusses Axanar's Financials and His Review Committee!"]] Fan Film Factor blog, 1/13/17.))
Line 102: Line 103:
  
 >  I came to the conclusion that my participation in Axanar … albeit below the line and specific, could be viewed as a conflict of interest.  Given that this exercise was designed for the donors and to give them an honest and independent assessment of Axanar’s financial dealings, I made the judgment that my participation in the process could be viewed as biased.((Official statement by Milton Santiago provided to AxaMonitor by Axanar spokesman Mike Bawden, 1/15/17.)) >  I came to the conclusion that my participation in Axanar … albeit below the line and specific, could be viewed as a conflict of interest.  Given that this exercise was designed for the donors and to give them an honest and independent assessment of Axanar’s financial dealings, I made the judgment that my participation in the process could be viewed as biased.((Official statement by Milton Santiago provided to AxaMonitor by Axanar spokesman Mike Bawden, 1/15/17.))
 +
 +<wrap lo>Read: //[[milton statement|Milton Santiago's full statement explaining his resignation]]//</wrap>
  
 === The Right Expertise === === The Right Expertise ===
Line 136: Line 139:
  
 ---- ----
-**Keywords** {{tag>commercial defendants}}+<wrap right>**Keywords** {{tag>commercial defendants fact_check financials}}</wrap>