Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
missing_emails [2018/02/10 09:44] – [Revving Up the Spin Machine] Carlos Pedrazamissing_emails [2018/02/10 20:31] (current) – [The Shill] Carlos Pedraza
Line 126: Line 126:
 Jason's third request of the court was for a privilege log, a list of records the defense claimed are protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege. Despite Ranahan's earlier statement to the studios' attorney that there were no privileged communications between Peters and legal counsel prior to the lawsuit, Peters confirmed in his deposition that he had, in fact, engaged and paid counsel in that time period. That was confirmed by Gossett in his deposition: Jason's third request of the court was for a privilege log, a list of records the defense claimed are protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege. Despite Ranahan's earlier statement to the studios' attorney that there were no privileged communications between Peters and legal counsel prior to the lawsuit, Peters confirmed in his deposition that he had, in fact, engaged and paid counsel in that time period. That was confirmed by Gossett in his deposition:
  
-> Mr. Gossett testified regarding documents that he produced (and Mr. Peters did not produce) showing that Mr. Peters had engaged counsel … to prepare agreements relating to the films, and other legal documents. … After [Ranahan's] statement that no privilege communications existed prior to the filing of this lawsuit was proven incorrect, Plaintiffs requested that a privilege log be provided.((Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Order, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, p. 13, 10/27/16.))+> Mr. Gossett testified regarding documents that he produced (and Mr. Peters did not produce) showing that Mr. Peters had engaged counsel … to prepare agreements relating to the films, and other legal documents. … After [Ranahan's] statement that no privileged communications existed prior to the filing of this lawsuit was proven incorrect, Plaintiffs requested that a privilege log be provided.((Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Order, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, p. 13, 10/27/16.))
  
 ===== Revving Up the Spin Machine ===== ===== Revving Up the Spin Machine =====
Line 165: Line 165:
 >  I was in the courtroom. Carlos wasn’t.  🙂 … I’ve been asked about this ridiculous rumor for the past two days by half a dozen people. … To me the REAL big story here is asking where Carlos Pedraza is getting his inside information from. There were EIGHT people in that courtroom on Friday: me, Erin Rahanan and Kelly Oki from Winston & Strawn, Jonathan Zavin and David Grossman from Loeb & Loeb, the judge, the clerk, and the court stenographer. \\ \\ I’m pretty sure the last three didn’t run and tell Carlos what was said during the hearing. I know that I didn’t tell him. I’m pretty sure Erin and Kelly didn’t tell him because, honestly, they don’t even tell ME jack shat! (And trust me, I’ve been trying!!!) So that leaves the Loeb & Loeb attorneys. I’m not sure which of them (or both) is feeding Carlos information about the case to disseminate to the masses, but the reason why is obvious: the studios need to find a way to drum up some support and sympathy from the fans. Carlos is a PR vehicle for them.((Jonathan Lane comment, [[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2016/10/23/axanar-lawsuit-discovery-ruling-what-does-it-all-mean-part-1/#comment-1248|"Axanar lawsuit discovery ruling – what does it all mean? (Part 1)," Fan Film Factor]], blog, 10/25/16.)) >  I was in the courtroom. Carlos wasn’t.  🙂 … I’ve been asked about this ridiculous rumor for the past two days by half a dozen people. … To me the REAL big story here is asking where Carlos Pedraza is getting his inside information from. There were EIGHT people in that courtroom on Friday: me, Erin Rahanan and Kelly Oki from Winston & Strawn, Jonathan Zavin and David Grossman from Loeb & Loeb, the judge, the clerk, and the court stenographer. \\ \\ I’m pretty sure the last three didn’t run and tell Carlos what was said during the hearing. I know that I didn’t tell him. I’m pretty sure Erin and Kelly didn’t tell him because, honestly, they don’t even tell ME jack shat! (And trust me, I’ve been trying!!!) So that leaves the Loeb & Loeb attorneys. I’m not sure which of them (or both) is feeding Carlos information about the case to disseminate to the masses, but the reason why is obvious: the studios need to find a way to drum up some support and sympathy from the fans. Carlos is a PR vehicle for them.((Jonathan Lane comment, [[http://fanfilmfactor.com/2016/10/23/axanar-lawsuit-discovery-ruling-what-does-it-all-mean-part-1/#comment-1248|"Axanar lawsuit discovery ruling – what does it all mean? (Part 1)," Fan Film Factor]], blog, 10/25/16.))
  
-Loeb attorneys have not responded to **AxaMonitor**'s repeated requests for interviews, just as Winston's have not; Editor Carlos Pedraza has no relationship with any of the attorneys. AxaMonitor obtained its information the old-fashioned way:  feet-on-the-beat reporting. {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}}+Loeb attorneys have not responded to **AxaMonitor**'s repeated requests for interviews, just as Winston's have not; Editor Carlos Pedraza has no relationship with any of the attorneys. **AxaMonitor** obtained its information the old-fashioned way:  feet-on-the-beat reporting. {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}}
  
 ---- ----
 **Keywords** {{tag>parties defendants plaintiffs defense lawsuit}} **Keywords** {{tag>parties defendants plaintiffs defense lawsuit}}