Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
peters_judgment [2019/05/16 17:20] – Carlos Pedrazapeters_judgment [2019/05/16 17:32] – Carlos Pedraza
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 ==== Jason DeBord ==== ==== Jason DeBord ====
 +
 +[{{ ::jason_debord-linkedin.jpg|**Jason DeBord** <fs x-small>LinkedIn</fs>}}]
  
 Peters sued blogger Jason DeBord in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company, Propworx. Peters sued blogger Jason DeBord in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company, Propworx.
 ---- ----
-<WRAP>//**__« <fs smaller>I hereby further verify … the entire amount of $13,640 is unpaid [by Peters], due and owing, plus court costs and interest accrued at 10 percent per annum.</fs> »__ **//  <wrap indent>//— Defendant Jason DeBoard, assigning his judgment for collection by Peters' newest legal opponent//</wrap></WRAP>+<WRAP>//**__« <fs smaller>I hereby further verify … the entire amount of $13,640 is unpaid [by Peters], due and owing, plus court costs and interest accrued at 10 percent per annum.</fs> »__ **//  <wrap indent>//— Defendant Jason DeBord, assigning his judgment for collection by Peters' newest legal opponent//</wrap></WRAP>
  
 <WRAP right round download 320px> <WRAP right round download 320px>
Line 43: Line 45:
 The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters. The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters.
  
-{{ :alec_peters.jpg?150|**Alec Peters**}}+[{{ :alec_peters.jpg?150|**Alec Peters**}}]
  
 ===== Why it Matters ===== ===== Why it Matters =====