Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
peters_kickstarter_facts [2016/10/11 02:24] – Correcting grammar Carlos Pedrazapeters_kickstarter_facts [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 72: Line 72:
 That led to three successive posts by Peters: That led to three successive posts by Peters:
  
-> David, the point is you claimed salaries were profit. They are not by any IRS definition. \\ \\ My point was <wrap hi>non-profits pay salaries</wrap>. And David, just because a project took 7 years does not mean the person worked full time. When a person works full time, it is unreasonable to expect that they work for free. And since <wrap hi>Star Trek New Voyages, Star Trek Continues and Star Trek Renegades all paid people</wrap>, please don't tell me that a fan film means you don't pay people. \\ \\ And Fan Films are generally, by definition, "not-for profit" <wrap hi>whether or not they are actual 501(c)3 entities.</wrap> There is no "profit" from Axanar.(([[https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/194429923/star-trek-axanar/comments?cursor=14630580#comment-14630579|Alec Peters comment, Star Trek Axanar Kickstarter project]], 10/10/16.))+> David, the point is you claimed salaries were profit. They are not by any IRS definition. \\ \\ My point was <wrap hi>non-profits pay salaries</wrap>. And David, just because a project took 7 years does not mean the person worked full time. When a person works full time, it is unreasonable to expect that they work for free. And since <wrap hi>Star Trek New Voyages, Star Trek Continues and Star Trek Renegades all paid people</wrap>, please don't tell me that a fan film means you don't pay people. \\ \\ And Fan Films are generally, by definition, "not-for profit" <wrap hi>whether or not they are actual 501%%(c)%%3 entities.</wrap> There is no "profit" from Axanar.(([[https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/194429923/star-trek-axanar/comments?cursor=14630580#comment-14630579|Alec Peters comment, Star Trek Axanar Kickstarter project]], 10/10/16.))
  
 <WRAP round todo> <WRAP round todo>
Line 80: Line 80:
  
 <wrap em>FALSE</wrap> **It's About Profit** Peters has used the "IRS definition" of profit as justification for why Axanar's revenue-generating activities should not count as "making money" from its use of Star Trek's intellectual property. **AxaMonitor** has already [[axanar_myths|debunked]] this notion by: <wrap em>FALSE</wrap> **It's About Profit** Peters has used the "IRS definition" of profit as justification for why Axanar's revenue-generating activities should not count as "making money" from its use of Star Trek's intellectual property. **AxaMonitor** has already [[axanar_myths|debunked]] this notion by:
-  * Documenting Axanar Productions status as a for-profit corporation in the state of California.+  * Documenting Axanar Productions' status as a for-profit corporation in the state of California.
   * Demonstrating Peters' definition of the term 'profit' isn't relevant to the direct financial benefit he is alleged to have gained from copyright infringement.   * Demonstrating Peters' definition of the term 'profit' isn't relevant to the direct financial benefit he is alleged to have gained from copyright infringement.