Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
tardigrades_dismissal_motion [2019/03/13 17:50] – [No Substantial Similarity] Carlos Pedrazatardigrades_dismissal_motion [2019/03/13 17:50] – Carlos Pedraza
Line 48: Line 48:
 <WRAP 90% center> <WRAP 90% center>
  
-  * The Tardigrade hug sequence pointed to as proof of infringement is a [[yout>ikHgCwM84LY|13-second video]] posted on YouTube in July 2017, two months before Discovery’s premiere but long after the show had been developed and filmed.+  * The Tardigrade hug sequence pointed to as proof of infringement is a [[yout>ikHgCwM84LY|13-second video]] <wrap hi>posted on YouTube in July 2017, two months before Discovery’s premiere but long after the show had been developed and filmed</wrap>.
   * “The only ‘similarities’ between the game and Discovery, says CBS, “is that both tardigrades are enlarged and can move through space. Space-faring tardigrades — including enlarged fictional tardigrades — are, of course, not original to Plaintiff.”   * “The only ‘similarities’ between the game and Discovery, says CBS, “is that both tardigrades are enlarged and can move through space. Space-faring tardigrades — including enlarged fictional tardigrades — are, of course, not original to Plaintiff.”
   * Other purported similarities are too generically described to qualify for copyright protection, according to the motion.   * Other purported similarities are too generically described to qualify for copyright protection, according to the motion.