Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
axanar_guidelines [2016/05/30 20:04] – adds invitation transcript Carlos Pedrazaaxanar_guidelines [2017/01/27 15:50] – [Revisions] format revision Carlos Pedraza
Line 2: Line 2:
 ====== Axanar Tries to Rally Fan Films to Its Proposed Guidelines ====== ====== Axanar Tries to Rally Fan Films to Its Proposed Guidelines ======
 {{TOC}} {{TOC}}
-<wrap lo>//See also: [[guidelines_backlash|Backlash: Fan Producers Disavow Axanar's Guideline Effort]]//</wrap>+<wrap lo>//See also: [[guidelines_backlash|Backlash: Fan Producers Disavow Axanar's Guideline Effort]]//, //[[leaker_accused|Peters Accuses Guidelines Leaker]]// and //[[intrepid|‘Intrepid’ Suspends Production]]//</wrap>
  
 With CBS and Paramount reportedly drafting guidelines for fan films, Axanar producer [[Alec Peters]] has reached out to at least nine fan productions for their support of rules Peters wants the studios to accept, and isn't having much luck. With CBS and Paramount reportedly drafting guidelines for fan films, Axanar producer [[Alec Peters]] has reached out to at least nine fan productions for their support of rules Peters wants the studios to accept, and isn't having much luck.
Line 27: Line 27:
 > “Unfortunately, James Cawley of Star Trek: New Voyages said no without even hearing a proposal. He was the only one who declined.  Everyone else wanted to at least see what a set of proposed guidelines would look like.”(("Forging Fan Film Guidelines,” Hubcap Dave blog, 5/27/16.)) > “Unfortunately, James Cawley of Star Trek: New Voyages said no without even hearing a proposal. He was the only one who declined.  Everyone else wanted to at least see what a set of proposed guidelines would look like.”(("Forging Fan Film Guidelines,” Hubcap Dave blog, 5/27/16.))
  
-==== Participating Producers ====+==== Participating Productions ====
  
-<wrap em>UPDATE</wrap> Peters appeared to have contacted more productions than those previously named, using the names of the prominent fan producers to attract others to participate.+<wrap em>UPDATE</wrap> Peters appeared to have contacted more productions than those previously named, using the names of the prominent fan producers and actors to attract others to participate.
  
 --> Transcript of Peters' Invitation (click to view)# --> Transcript of Peters' Invitation (click to view)#
Line 46: Line 46:
 <-- <--
  
-The producers contacted by Peters represented larger, well-known productions as well as smaller fan films. They included:+The people contacted by Peters comprised larger, well-known productions as well as smaller fan films. They included:
  
 <WRAP right box 50%> <WRAP right box 50%>
Line 55: Line 55:
   * John Broughton of Farragut   * John Broughton of Farragut
   * John Atkin of Yorktown   * John Atkin of Yorktown
-  * Nick Cook of Starship Intrepid+  * Nick Cook of Star Trek: Intrepid 
 +  * Jim Bray of Star Trek: Anthology, who did not participate(([[http://holosuitemedia.com/tie219/|Interview on Tribbles in Ecstasy podcast, "Take 219: No Win Situations"]], released 5/31/16.))
   * Michael King of Starship Valiant   * Michael King of Starship Valiant
   * Scott Johnson of Starbase Studios (who produces several small Star Trek fan films)   * Scott Johnson of Starbase Studios (who produces several small Star Trek fan films)
Line 64: Line 65:
  
 One source connected to CBS who asked not to be named reported that of the other fan productions [[guidelines_backlash|few have endorsed]] Peters' effort.  One source connected to CBS who asked not to be named reported that of the other fan productions [[guidelines_backlash|few have endorsed]] Peters' effort. 
- 
 ===== Proposed Guidelines ===== ===== Proposed Guidelines =====
  
Line 124: Line 124:
  
 <WRAP right round info 50%> <WRAP right round info 50%>
-The following sections, **Analysis of the Proposal** and **Court of Public Opinion,** include opinion and/or informed speculation‭.+<wrap lo>The following sections, **Analysis of the Proposal** and **Court of Public Opinion,** include opinion and/or informed speculation‭.</wrap>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 ===== Analysis of the Proposal ===== ===== Analysis of the Proposal =====
Line 169: Line 169:
  
 ---- ----
-**Keywords** {{tag>fan_films}}+**Keywords** {{tag>news fan_films guidelines}}