Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
bawden_s_broad_brush [2016/04/05 23:37] – [Bawden's Broad Brush] Carlos Pedrazabawden_s_broad_brush [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-{{::broad-brush.jpg|}}+{{::broad-brush.jpg|Used under Creative Commons license}}
 ====== Bawden's Broad Brush ====== ====== Bawden's Broad Brush ======
 <WRAP left box> <WRAP left box>
Line 10: Line 10:
 **AXANAR SPOKESMAN** Mike Bawden has been very polite and respectful to people, one on one. Even jovial within the [[face>groups/CBSvsAxanar/|CBS/Paramount v. Axanar Facebook group]]. I'd definitely have a beer with him [insert drink of choice]. **AXANAR SPOKESMAN** Mike Bawden has been very polite and respectful to people, one on one. Even jovial within the [[face>groups/CBSvsAxanar/|CBS/Paramount v. Axanar Facebook group]]. I'd definitely have a beer with him [insert drink of choice].
  
-The trouble with his recent diatribe, "[[http://www.axanarproductions.com/rage-against-the-machine/|Rage Against the Machine]]," was him zooming out and impugning the motives of an entire group of people with a broad brush, under the cover of delineating them under seven categories, making it seem like an entirely reasonable approach.+The trouble with his recent diatribe, "[[http://www.axanarproductions.com/rage-against-the-machine/|Rage Against the Machine]]," was him zooming out and impugning the motives of an entire group of people with a broad brush, under the cover of delineating them under seven categories, making it seem like an entirely reasonable approach, certainly gentler than Axanar producer [[Alec Peters]]' constant refrain against "haters."
  
 But the premise — that everyone in that group wants to "tear down" Axanar or "hates" Alec Peters — is inherently flawed, using his desired conclusion instead as his premise. Is there truth lodged within his seven categories? Indeed. I could myself point to individual examples illustrating each of his seven types of detractors. But the question is, do they all add up to those seven categories? Of course not. I could just as easily find people who don't fit any of those categories. But the premise — that everyone in that group wants to "tear down" Axanar or "hates" Alec Peters — is inherently flawed, using his desired conclusion instead as his premise. Is there truth lodged within his seven categories? Indeed. I could myself point to individual examples illustrating each of his seven types of detractors. But the question is, do they all add up to those seven categories? Of course not. I could just as easily find people who don't fit any of those categories.
Line 22: Line 22:
 **I AM NO. 6** For myself, I can see that I must fall into his group number 6: **I AM NO. 6** For myself, I can see that I must fall into his group number 6:
  
-> A select few of the "detractors" who have found their posts and claims about Axanar Productions, Alec and Rob drive traffic to their websites. Is there a commercial advantage to doing so? If there is one, I can’t believe it’s too much of one – the audience involved here is pretty small – but having the ability to drive people to your website gives one a sense of control that can be intoxicating.​+> [{{ :mike-bawden.jpg?nolink|Axanar's **Mike Bawden**}}]A select few of the "detractors" who have found their posts and claims about Axanar Productions, Alec and Rob drive traffic to their websites. Is there a commercial advantage to doing so? If there is one, I can’t believe it’s too much of one – the audience involved here is pretty small – but having the ability to drive people to your website gives one a sense of control that can be intoxicating.​
  
 Since **AxaMonitor** carries no advertising, clearly no commercial advantage accrues to me. That leaves, of course, only one other motivation in Mike's estimation. Surely, what drives me is "having the ability to drive people to [my] website," offering me "a sense of control that can be intoxicating." So I'm either a greedy bastard or a control freak drunk on power. Not a very broad spectrum of motivation Mike offers me: I can only be evil, or //more evil//. Since **AxaMonitor** carries no advertising, clearly no commercial advantage accrues to me. That leaves, of course, only one other motivation in Mike's estimation. Surely, what drives me is "having the ability to drive people to [my] website," offering me "a sense of control that can be intoxicating." So I'm either a greedy bastard or a control freak drunk on power. Not a very broad spectrum of motivation Mike offers me: I can only be evil, or //more evil//.
 +
 +**KINDER, GENTLER** In fact, he sums up all the detractors as either being people who feel they've been unfairly wronged and who can make appeals to a kinder, gentler Axanar, or being "bullies, harassers and conspiracy theorists."
  
 <WRAP right box 50%> <WRAP right box 50%>
-//**__It appears more convenient to attack a straw man than one who brings facts to bear, and critical questions and a sincere desire to see fan productions survive this debacle.__**//+//**__It appears more convenient to attack a straw man than one bearing facts, critical questions and a sincere desire to see fan productions survive this debacle.__**//
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-**KINDER, GENTLER** In fact, he sums up all the detractors as either being people who feel they've been unfairly wronged and who can make appeals to a kinder, gentler Axanar, or being "bullies, harassers and conspiracy theorists."+There's no room in the world he describes to Axanar's supporters for anyone who simply wants to hold the production accountable to the standards of openness and transparency with which it touts itself, for anyone who cares about how the professional, commercial venture trading off CBS and Paramount's property — the studios' words, not mine — imperils all other fan films.
  
-There's no room in the world he describes for Axanar's supporters for anyone who simply wants to hold Axanar accountable to the standards of openness and transparency with which it touts itself, for anyone who cares about how the professional, commercial venture trading off CBS and Paramount's property — the studios' words, not mine — imperils all other fan films.+**AT HIS WORD** I take Mike at his word that he zealously represents his client because he cares about the project, that he wants to see //Axanar// made, that it embodies an idea of Star Trek that thousands of fans want to see brought to life. I don't see why he can't offer me the same courtesy, instead seeking to discredit what I've published about Axanar by impugning my motivations. Why not engage my critiques on their merits, with logic and facts and open discussion?
  
-**AT HIS WORD** I take Mike at his word that he zealously represents his client because he cares about the project, that he wants to see Axanar made, that it embodies an idea of Star Trek that thousands of fans want to see brought to life. I don't see why he can't offer me the same courtesy, instead seeking to discredit what I've published about Axanar by impugning my motivations. Why not engage my critiques on their merits, with logic and facts and open discussion?+He has never once pointed to anything on **AxaMonitor** and said, "That's wrong. That's inaccurate. That's unfair." Despite the meticulous sourcing of each article, no objection of substance has ever been lodged that I haven't answered. Instead, we see the setup of a straw man "detractor," motivated by greed or narcissism or some intoxicating mixture of both, easily dismissed. It appears to be more convenient to attack that opponent than one bearing facts, critical questions and a sincere desire to see fan productions survive this debacle.
  
-He has never once pointed to anything on AxaMonitor and said, "That's wrong. That's inaccurate. That's unfair." Despite the meticulous sourcing of each article, no objection of substance has ever been lodged that I haven't answered. Instead, we see the setup of a straw man "detractor," motivated by greed or narcissism or some intoxicating mixture of both, easily dismissed. It appears to be more convenient to attack that opponent than one who brings facts to bear, and critical questions and a sincere desire to see fan productions survive this debacle.+---- 
 +**Keywords** {{tag>about news}}