Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
bloomberg_article [2016/05/19 14:00] – [Bloomberg Article Elides Important Axanar Facts] adds inaccuracies in 'bottom line' Carlos Pedrazabloomberg_article [2016/05/19 14:22] – [Bloomberg Article Elides Important Axanar Facts] edits to tighten, clairfy Carlos Pedraza
Line 28: Line 28:
   - Ignores the fact no other fan production has approached this scope, despite Axanar's talking point that it's just like all the others. \\ \\   - Ignores the fact no other fan production has approached this scope, despite Axanar's talking point that it's just like all the others. \\ \\
   - Ignores Axanar's extensive ongoing Star Trek [[merchandise|merchandising operation]] when considering Alec Peters' claim his production has done the plaintiffs no harm. \\ \\   - Ignores Axanar's extensive ongoing Star Trek [[merchandise|merchandising operation]] when considering Alec Peters' claim his production has done the plaintiffs no harm. \\ \\
-  - Seems unaware of hundreds of thousand of donor dollars spent building out a [[investor_group|revenue-generating studio]] that is now being rented out to other productions. \\ \\+  - Seems unaware of hundreds of thousand of donor dollars spent building out a [[investor_group|revenue-generating studio]] now being advertised for rental to other productions. \\ \\
   - Buys Axanar's "no harm to plaintiffs" talking point while ignoring that under copyright law, infringement itself is the only harm copyrightholders have to prove, and that Axanar has harmed the copyright holders' rights to control the creation of derivative works.(([[http://ogc.harvard.edu/pages/copyright-and-fair-use|"Copyright and Fair Use," Office of General Counsel, Harvard University]], retrieved 5/19/16.)) \\ \\   - Buys Axanar's "no harm to plaintiffs" talking point while ignoring that under copyright law, infringement itself is the only harm copyrightholders have to prove, and that Axanar has harmed the copyright holders' rights to control the creation of derivative works.(([[http://ogc.harvard.edu/pages/copyright-and-fair-use|"Copyright and Fair Use," Office of General Counsel, Harvard University]], retrieved 5/19/16.)) \\ \\
   - Ignores the fact that Axanar's alleged direct financial benefit is central to harm, with Judge Klausner specifically citing Axanar's $1 million take as sufficient evidence against the defense's effort to strike out the "direct financial benefit" claim in the legal complaint.(("Vicarious Infringement: Direct Financial Benefit Allegations Made on 'Information and Belief,'" Judge R. Gary Klausner's Order to Deny Motion to Dismiss, p. 5 §B(2), 5/9/16.)) \\ \\   - Ignores the fact that Axanar's alleged direct financial benefit is central to harm, with Judge Klausner specifically citing Axanar's $1 million take as sufficient evidence against the defense's effort to strike out the "direct financial benefit" claim in the legal complaint.(("Vicarious Infringement: Direct Financial Benefit Allegations Made on 'Information and Belief,'" Judge R. Gary Klausner's Order to Deny Motion to Dismiss, p. 5 §B(2), 5/9/16.)) \\ \\