Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
does [2016/06/09 01:29] – updates throughout with naming deadline passed Carlos Pedrazadoes [2018/11/06 22:35] (current) – [The Does] Carlos Pedraza
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 <WRAP round important> <WRAP round important>
-<wrap em>UPDATE</wrap> According to the court's May 10, 2016, scheduling order, both sides had until May 25 to "to join other parties or to amend the pleadings" in the case. That date passed with none of the Does named.+<fs smaller><wrap em>UPDATE</wrap> According to the court's May 10, 2016, scheduling order, both sides had until May 25 to "to join other parties or to amend the pleadings" in the case. That date passed with none of the Does named.</fs>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +
 +==== Why Weren't Any Does Named? ====
  
 <WRAP right round info 50%> <WRAP right round info 50%>
-This section, **Why Weren't Any Does Named?** features opinion and informed speculation. +<wrap lo>This section, **Why Weren't Any Does Named?** features opinion and informed speculation.</wrap></WRAP>
-</WRAP> +
- +
-==== Why Weren't Any Does Named? ====+
  
 In their May 2, 2016, [[joint statement]] to the judge ahead of the case's [[scheduling conference]], both sides indicated a reluctance to adding parties to the suit.((Rule 26 Joint Report by Plaintiffs and Defendants, p. 2 line 12.)) In their May 2, 2016, [[joint statement]] to the judge ahead of the case's [[scheduling conference]], both sides indicated a reluctance to adding parties to the suit.((Rule 26 Joint Report by Plaintiffs and Defendants, p. 2 line 12.))
  
-If you assume the plaintiffs are suing in order to make an example of how Axanar went too far, they'll only go as far as they need to make that point. For every new defendant they add to the case, CBS and Paramount would've had to prove with a preponderance of evidence that each one participated in:+If you assume the plaintiffs are suing in order to make an example of how Axanar went too far, they'll only go as far as they need to make that point. For every new defendant they add to the case, CBS and Paramount would've had to prove with a preponderance of evidence that each one participated in at least one of these activities:
  
   * Writing scripts   * Writing scripts
Line 133: Line 132:
 Tourangeau appeared to express more Axanar regrets in another subtweeted exchange — this time with [[CBS officials|John Van Citters]], vice president of product development at CBS Consumer Products. Tourangeau appeared to express more Axanar regrets in another subtweeted exchange — this time with [[CBS officials|John Van Citters]], vice president of product development at CBS Consumer Products.
 {{::sean-van-citters.jpg?nolink|}} {{::sean-van-citters.jpg?nolink|}}
-===== Legal Representation ===== 
-<wrap lo>//See also: [[Other attorneys]]//</wrap> 
- 
-‬While the named defendants, [[Alec Peters]] and‭ [[Axanar Productions]], have secured free [[Winston & Strawn|legal representation]], potential conflicts of interest mean it's not likely‭ those attorneys can also represent the Does. 
- 
-That means those additional defendants, once named, are ‬personally and financially liable for some measure of damages in the lawsuit ‬and open for the plaintiffs to co-opt to testify against Axanar‭. {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}} 
  
 ---- ----
 **Keywords** **Keywords**
 {{tag>defendants copyright players lawsuit does}} {{tag>defendants copyright players lawsuit does}}