Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
gerrold_repudiates [2016/04/25 11:23] – created Carlos Pedrazagerrold_repudiates [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Gerrold Repudiates Axanar Slur ====== ====== Gerrold Repudiates Axanar Slur ======
 +[{{ ::david-gerrold-fb.jpg?&200|**SCIFI AUTHOR** David Gerrold, from his Facebook profile.}}]
  
 <WRAP box> <WRAP box>
Line 5: Line 6:
 <wrap lo>By [[user>cpedraza|Carlos Pedraza]] \\ <wrap lo>By [[user>cpedraza|Carlos Pedraza]] \\
 **AxaMonitor** editor \\ **AxaMonitor** editor \\
-April 25, 2016</wrap>+April 25, 2016</wrap> \\ 
 +//**__Commentary__**//
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 Author David Gerrold has repudiated a derogatory quote about me attributed to him by Axanar producer [[Alec Peters]] in order to discredit **AxaMonitor**'s coverage. Author David Gerrold has repudiated a derogatory quote about me attributed to him by Axanar producer [[Alec Peters]] in order to discredit **AxaMonitor**'s coverage.
- 
-[{{ ::david-gerrold-fb.jpg?&200|**SCIFI AUTHOR** David Gerrold, from his Facebook profile.}}] 
  
 In the 3,969-member public Facebook group Star Trek, Peters criticized **AxaMonitor**'s coverage of [[tommy_kraft|CBS' shutdown]] of the //Star Trek–Horizon//'s sequel this way: In the 3,969-member public Facebook group Star Trek, Peters criticized **AxaMonitor**'s coverage of [[tommy_kraft|CBS' shutdown]] of the //Star Trek–Horizon//'s sequel this way:
 +
 +> Let's be clear, the writer of that article, Cqarols [sic] Pedraza has a hard on for Axanar and does whatever he can to bash Axanar. He is neither a journalist nor a truth-seeker. He is also someone that David Gerrodl [sic] called a man "With credits and no credential."(([[face>groups/451133181716112/permalink/622895974539831/?comment_id=622952334534195&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R6%22%7D|Alec Peters post to Star Trek Facebook group]], 4/24/16.))
  
 <WRAP right box 50%> <WRAP right box 50%>
 //**__‘I've had people attach my name to rumor, gossip, and lies before — it's one of the things that really pisses me off. ’__**// — //Scifi author David Gerrold// //**__‘I've had people attach my name to rumor, gossip, and lies before — it's one of the things that really pisses me off. ’__**// — //Scifi author David Gerrold//
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
- 
-> Let's be clear, the writer of that article, Cqarols [sic] Pedraza has a hard on for Axanar and does whatever he can to bash Axanar. He is neither a journalist nor a truth-seeker. He is also someone that David Gerrodl [sic] called a man "Wiith credits and no credential."(([[face>groups/451133181716112/permalink/622895974539831/?comment_id=622952334534195&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R6%22%7D|Alec Peters post to Star Trek Facebook group]], 4/24/16.)) 
  
 Peters may not know that David Gerrold and I have been friends for 13 years (we collaborated on the teleplay for the //Star Trek: New Voyages// episode, "Blood and Fire"), so I was alarmed to hear something like this attributed to him. Peters may not know that David Gerrold and I have been friends for 13 years (we collaborated on the teleplay for the //Star Trek: New Voyages// episode, "Blood and Fire"), so I was alarmed to hear something like this attributed to him.
Line 26: Line 26:
 > Alec and I were talking about a different project. We were talking about writers we knew and writers we'd trust. \\ \\ A number of names came up. I was particularly candid about one self-inflated fanboy who had demonstrated inordinate rudeness to myself and other writers. Apparently, Alec was distracted — there were some phone calls in there — and didn't realize that <wrap hi>I was talking about someone else.</wrap>  \\ \\ It was supposed to be a private conversation anyway, and <wrap hi>Alec should not have repeated the remark, and he should not have badmouthed anyone, particularly you, Carlos, and then attributed it to me.</wrap> \\ \\ I've had people attach my name to rumor, gossip, and lies before -- it's one of the things that really pisses me off. \\ \\ You may quote me.((Facebook Messenger post from David Gerrold to Carlos Pedraza, 4/24/16.)) <wrap lo>[//emphasis added//]</wrap> > Alec and I were talking about a different project. We were talking about writers we knew and writers we'd trust. \\ \\ A number of names came up. I was particularly candid about one self-inflated fanboy who had demonstrated inordinate rudeness to myself and other writers. Apparently, Alec was distracted — there were some phone calls in there — and didn't realize that <wrap hi>I was talking about someone else.</wrap>  \\ \\ It was supposed to be a private conversation anyway, and <wrap hi>Alec should not have repeated the remark, and he should not have badmouthed anyone, particularly you, Carlos, and then attributed it to me.</wrap> \\ \\ I've had people attach my name to rumor, gossip, and lies before -- it's one of the things that really pisses me off. \\ \\ You may quote me.((Facebook Messenger post from David Gerrold to Carlos Pedraza, 4/24/16.)) <wrap lo>[//emphasis added//]</wrap>
  
-It's a shame that, rather than engaging the Axanar controversy, and our coverage of it, with facts, Peters continues to choose //ad hominem// attacks, grasping at straws for whatever flimsy authority he can to bolster his attempt to discredit and deflect valid criticism by maligning the character of those making the criticism.+It's a shame that, rather than engaging the Axanar controversy, and our coverage of it, with facts, Peters continues to choose //ad hominem// attacks, grasping at whatever flimsy authority he can to bolster his attempt to discredit and deflect valid criticism by maligning the character of critics.
  
 David also told me he would address the misattribution of his words directly with Peters, which I imagine led to this post the following day: David also told me he would address the misattribution of his words directly with Peters, which I imagine led to this post the following day:
Line 32: Line 32:
 > I have asked to remove my previous comment about Carlos Pedraza that was attributed to David Gerrold. David has indicated he was referring to another writer. That comment was said to me in private and I should not have repeated it here.(([[face>groups/451133181716112/permalink/622895974539831/?comment_id=622952334534195&reply_comment_id=623130181183077&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R9%22%7D|Alec Peters post to Star Trek Facebook group]], 4/25/16.)) > I have asked to remove my previous comment about Carlos Pedraza that was attributed to David Gerrold. David has indicated he was referring to another writer. That comment was said to me in private and I should not have repeated it here.(([[face>groups/451133181716112/permalink/622895974539831/?comment_id=622952334534195&reply_comment_id=623130181183077&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R9%22%7D|Alec Peters post to Star Trek Facebook group]], 4/25/16.))
  
-As further indication of Peters' unwillingness to engage on the facts, I had to rely on friends for the links to Peters' posts to that Facebook group because (surprise!) he had me blocked from the page.+As further indication of Peters' unwillingness to engage on the facts, I had to rely on friends for the links to Peters' posts to that Facebook group because (surprise!) he had me blocked from the page. So, all in all, a fantastic apology. 
 + 
 +<wrap em>UPDATE</wrap> Peters edited his original post to strike out the portion indicated below. The rest of his invective remains: 
 + 
 +> Let's be clear, the writer of that article, Cqarols [sic] Pedraza has a hard on for Axanar and does whatever he can to bash Axanar. He is neither a journalist nor a truth-seeker. <del>He is also someone that David Gerrodl [sic] called a man “Wiith credits and no credential.”</del>(([[face>groups/451133181716112/permalink/622895974539831/?comment_id=622952334534195&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R6%22%7D|Alec Peters post to Star Trek Facebook group]], 4/24/16.)) {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}} 
 + 
 +---- 
 +**Keywords** {{tag>about}}