Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
hero_prop_suit [2019/02/19 18:59] – Carlos Pedrazahero_prop_suit [2019/02/19 22:22] – Carlos Pedraza
Line 15: Line 15:
 Meanwhile, Peters himself filed an amended countersuit November 7, 2018, seeking $165,000 in damages, plus attorneys' fees and other damages, claiming he is owed for his role in the six-figure sale brokered by the company of the model of the U.S.S. Enterprise-E from //Star Trek: First Contact//. Meanwhile, Peters himself filed an amended countersuit November 7, 2018, seeking $165,000 in damages, plus attorneys' fees and other damages, claiming he is owed for his role in the six-figure sale brokered by the company of the model of the U.S.S. Enterprise-E from //Star Trek: First Contact//.
  
-Armstrong's suit seeks at least $15,000 in damages after Peters allegedly defamed her in a series of posts in a large Facebook props enthusiasts' group. She also wants a judge to declare Peters is not entitled to a share of the sale's proceeds. Her company, Hero Prop, buys and sells rare and collectible movie props, costumes, and television/film memorabilia.+Armstrong's suit seeks at least $15,000 in damages after Peters allegedly defamed her in a series of posts in a large Facebook props enthusiasts' group. 
 + 
 +{{page>subscribe}} 
 + 
 +She also wants a judge to declare Peters is not entitled to a share of the sale's proceeds. Her company, Hero Prop, buys and sells rare and collectible movie props, costumes, and television/film memorabilia.
  
 Her lawsuit was first filed in Clark County District Court in Nevada on September 21, 2018, naming Peters as a defendant, along with his company, [[propworx-email|Propworx]].  Her lawsuit was first filed in Clark County District Court in Nevada on September 21, 2018, naming Peters as a defendant, along with his company, [[propworx-email|Propworx]]. 
Line 92: Line 96:
 The owner characterized his relationship with Peters somewhat differently, telling **AxaMonitor** in a one-sentence statement, "I have not communicated, or been called/emailed, from Alec in the last five years."((Email from Adam Schneider to Carlos Pedraza, 10/11/18.)) The owner characterized his relationship with Peters somewhat differently, telling **AxaMonitor** in a one-sentence statement, "I have not communicated, or been called/emailed, from Alec in the last five years."((Email from Adam Schneider to Carlos Pedraza, 10/11/18.))
  
-==== $200,000 in Damages ====+==== Peters' Damages ====
  
 Peters' counterclaim alleged Armstrong and Hero Prop committed breach of contract, unjust enrichment and fraudulent misrepresentation, for which Peters planned to seek at least $165,000 in damages, plus court costs, attorney’s fees and punitive damages.((Defendants' Answer to Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Damages and Counterclaim, pp. 12-15, 11/7/2018.)) Peters' counterclaim alleged Armstrong and Hero Prop committed breach of contract, unjust enrichment and fraudulent misrepresentation, for which Peters planned to seek at least $165,000 in damages, plus court costs, attorney’s fees and punitive damages.((Defendants' Answer to Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Damages and Counterclaim, pp. 12-15, 11/7/2018.))
Line 156: Line 160:
 <WRAP tip 75%> <WRAP tip 75%>
 <wrap em>COMMENTS</wrap> \\ <wrap em>COMMENTS</wrap> \\
-Discuss this article in [[face>groups/axamonitor/permalink/502341973613988/|AxaMonitor's Facebook group]].+Discuss this article in [[face>groups/axamonitor/permalink/582039078977610/|AxaMonitor's Facebook group]].
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 ---- ----
-**Keywords**{{tag>lawsuit legal Alec_Peters propworx props}}+**Keywords**{{tag>lawsuit legal Alec_Peters propworx props Hero_Prop}}