Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
mudds [2019/03/08 18:37] – Carlos Pedraza | mudds [2019/03/09 01:23] – [Debate, Criticism and Additional Facts] Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:: | {{:: | ||
- | ====== AxaMonitor' | + | <fs x-small> |
+ | ====== AxaMonitor' | ||
+ | {{TOC}} | ||
{{page> | {{page> | ||
- | We' | + | We decided |
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
+ | |||
Like the Post's " | Like the Post's " | ||
- | <WRAP right info 50%> | + | <WRAP right info round 320px> |
{{:: | {{:: | ||
<wrap lo> | <wrap lo> | ||
Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ==== Meet Harcourt Fenton Mudd ==== | + | ===== Meet Harcourt Fenton Mudd ===== |
Mudd, for short. One of the most popular antagonists of Star Trek's original series, the character was even revived on The Animated Series and more recently on //Star Trek: Discovery// | Mudd, for short. One of the most popular antagonists of Star Trek's original series, the character was even revived on The Animated Series and more recently on //Star Trek: Discovery// | ||
- | He's a lying, thieving, self-aggrandizing, | + | He's a lying, thieving, self-aggrandizing, |
- | ==== Muddying the Truth ==== | + | ===== Muddying the Truth ===== |
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | {{page> | + | <WRAP right round important 320px> |
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | <wrap lo>< | ||
+ | </ | ||
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | + | ||
- | {{:: | + | |
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | \\ \\ | ||
{{:: | {{:: | ||
- | <fs 24px> | + | {{: |
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | ==== Recidivism Watch ==== | + | ==== Re-offenders |
- | + | ||
- | Finally, we also have a feature called “Recidivism Watch,” which highlights claims repeated by politicians even though the claim has been previously debunked. | + | |
+ | {{:: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | ==== Debate and Criticism ==== | + | <WRAP right round info 320px> |
- | + | ||
- | All judgments are subject to debate and criticism from our readers and interested parties, and can be revised if fresh evidence emerges. We invite you to join the discussion on these pages and contact the Fact Checker directly with tips, suggestions, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | <WRAP right round info 50%> | + | |
<wrap lo> | <wrap lo> | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ==== Additional Facts to Contribute | + | ===== Debate, Criticism and Additional Facts ===== |
- | If you have facts or documents that shed more light on the subject under discussion, or if you think we have made a mistake, please let us know. We also want to make sure that the authors of questionable claims have ample opportunity to argue their case. We issue our own ruling on factual disputes (see our rules on the “Pinocchio Test” below) but it can be revised and updated if fresh evidence emerges. Our view is that a fact check is never really finished, so the rating can be revised after we obtain new information that changes the factual basis for our original ruling. | + | We'll look to revise any judgments if new evidence emerges, and we encourage feedback from readers |
+ | |||
+ | Think we're being unfair? Let us know; we're happy to discuss | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP tip 75%> | ||
+ | <wrap em> | ||
+ | Discuss this article in [[face> | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | **Keywords** {{tag> |