no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Previous revisionLast revision | |||
— | order_exclude_evidence [2017/01/18 09:48] – [Judge Rules on Excluding Evidence] updates w/tentative Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <WRAP rightalign> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | ====== Judge Rules on Excluding Evidence ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Federal [[judge_r._gary_klausner|Judge R. Gary Klausner]] ruled on pending motions by attorneys on both sides of the Axanar copyright infringement case to exclude major pieces of evidence and witnesses from the upcoming January 31, 2017, trial. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Klausner' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Klausner noted, however, that his rulings were only [[evidence-tentative|tentative]]; | ||
+ | ===== Plaintiffs' | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Motion to exclude altered financial statements and its contents — DENIED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Motion to exclude evidence and arguments relating to versions for the potential fan film, Axanar, created by Defendants after litigation was filed — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Motion to exclude evidence and testimony relating to public statements made by J.J. Abrams and Justin Lin — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Motion to exclude testimony and documents from lay witness [[which_kobayashi_maru|Reece Watkins]] — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5. Motion to exclude testimony and documents from lay witness, Fan Film Factor blogger [[gofundme|Jonathan Lane]] — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 6. Motion to exclude testimony and documents regarding Star Trek fan films — STILL UNDER CONSIDERATION. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 7. Motion to exclude testimony and documents discussing Alec Peters’ unrelated work regarding Star Trek props — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 8. Motion to exclude testimony, documents, or other evidence created or made after this lawsuit was filed — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 9. Motion to exclude the testimony of Defendants’ expert financial witness [[witness_list|Christian Tregillis]] — DENIED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10. Motion to exclude the testimony of University of Southern California media studies professor, Henry Jenkins, who was to testify on fan productions' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Defendants' | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from relying on evidence concerning alleged discovery violations — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from relying on evidence not disclosed before the cut-off for discovery — DENIED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from introducing evidence regarding allegedly infringed works not identified in the legal complaint — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from relying on evidence regarding items that are unoriginal, in the public domain, or from third parties —GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from relying on evidence concerning personal drama, smear campaign, and other irrelevant communications, | ||
+ | |||
+ | 6. Motion to preclude Plantiffs from introducing evidence referencing older, so-called superseded scripts —GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 7. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from introducing Defendants’ financial information and references to “profits” allegedly earned by Defendants — DENIED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 8. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from introducing evidence regarding Defendants’ use of the “Star Trek” name — DENIED | ||
+ | |||
+ | 9. Motion to preclude Plaintiffs from introducing evidence as to the professional nature of Defendants’ Works — GRANTED. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | **Keywords** {{tag> |