Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
peters_sues_burnett [2019/02/24 17:05] – Carlos Pedraza | peters_sues_burnett [2019/06/23 13:27] (current) – [Advice: Deleted] adds tag Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
- | <fs x-small> | + | <fs x-small> |
====== Peters Sues Former Axanar Director in Georgia Court ====== | ====== Peters Sues Former Axanar Director in Georgia Court ====== | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
**//Legal Questions Emerge Over Whether a Georgia Court Has Jurisdiction Over Robert Burnett// ** | **//Legal Questions Emerge Over Whether a Georgia Court Has Jurisdiction Over Robert Burnett// ** | ||
- | | + | |
+ | <WRAP> | ||
+ | //**__ __**// <wrap lo>**By [[user> | ||
+ | <fs smaller>// | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | LAWRENCEVILLE, | ||
- | Producer [[: | ||
===== Legal Complaint ===== | ===== Legal Complaint ===== | ||
Line 16: | Line 21: | ||
{{page> | {{page> | ||
- | **The legal complaint against | + | In the legal complaint against Burnett, Peters |
- | * **Bad loans**: Peters' | + | |
- | * **Bad production**: | + | * **Bad production**: |
* **Bad equipment**: | * **Bad equipment**: | ||
- | * **Bad words**: Peters claims Burnett violating a non-disclosure agreement by releasing material developed for //Axanar, //including the film's// //shooting script. | + | * **Bad words**: Peters claims Burnett violating a non-disclosure agreement by releasing material developed for //Axanar, //including the film’s shooting script. |
- | * **Bad document**: A copy of the NDA is included as exhibit A. Lawyers we've consulted raise doubts about the enforceability of that document, however. | + | * **Bad document**: A copy of the NDA is included as exhibit A. Lawyers we’ve consulted raise doubts about the enforceability of that document, however. |
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP right round download 320px> <fs larger>< | ||
* **Bad views**: Among the released material were several behind-the-scenes documentaries Burnett has publicly released. | * **Bad views**: Among the released material were several behind-the-scenes documentaries Burnett has publicly released. | ||
- | * **Bad-mouthing**: | + | * **Bad-mouthing**: |
* **Bad business**: To sue Burnett, a California resident, in Georgia, Peters claims the defendant has transacted business in Georgia. The complaint includes no documentation of such business. | * **Bad business**: To sue Burnett, a California resident, in Georgia, Peters claims the defendant has transacted business in Georgia. The complaint includes no documentation of such business. | ||
- | * **Bad information**: | + | * **Bad information**: |
- | * **Bad company**: The legal complaint cites Peters as Axanar Productions' | + | * **Bad company**: The legal complaint cites Peters as Axanar Productions’ sole shareholder. However, Axanar became a California non-profit public benefit company in 2017; it can have no shareholders. Nor is he the only officer of the corporation; |
* **Bad math**: Damages summed up in fifth count of the complaint total $45,534, while damages listed earlier in the document add up to only $45,498. | * **Bad math**: Damages summed up in fifth count of the complaint total $45,534, while damages listed earlier in the document add up to only $45,498. | ||
==== Burnett Responds ==== | ==== Burnett Responds ==== | ||
- | |||
- | <WRAP right round important 320px> <fs larger>< | ||
Burnett responded to news of the lawsuit on Twitter, though it didn’t appear he had yet been served with legal papers: | Burnett responded to news of the lawsuit on Twitter, though it didn’t appear he had yet been served with legal papers: | ||
Line 53: | Line 59: | ||
One way or another, however, Burnett would have to contest the suit it in some forum, either making a special appearance in Georgia for the limited purpose of contesting jurisdiction, | One way or another, however, Burnett would have to contest the suit it in some forum, either making a special appearance in Georgia for the limited purpose of contesting jurisdiction, | ||
- | {{: | + | {{: |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 105: | Line 111: | ||
**Keywords** | **Keywords** | ||
- | {{tag> | + | {{tag>Peters_v._Burnett |