Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
tardigrades_opposition_response [2019/03/14 15:21] – Carlos Pedrazatardigrades_opposition_response [2019/03/14 15:39] – Carlos Pedraza
Line 1: Line 1:
 {{::cbs_respons_opposition.jpg|}} {{::cbs_respons_opposition.jpg|}}
  
-<fs x-small>MARCH 14, 2019<wrap indent> | </wrap><wrap indent> 4 MIN READ</wrap></fs>+<fs x-small>MARCH 14, 2019<wrap indent> | </wrap><wrap indent> 3 MIN READ</wrap></fs>
  
 ====== CBS Attorney Slams Tardigrades' Lack of Legal Foundation ====== ====== CBS Attorney Slams Tardigrades' Lack of Legal Foundation ======
Line 26: Line 26:
   * **Purported characters' similarities**: Abdin's pleading criticized CBS for dissecting his characters to their most generic components (e.g., "blond white male," "African-American female," "redhead" and "darker complexion" male) but Hwang notes those terms are the extent to which Abdin himself specifically described his own characters.   * **Purported characters' similarities**: Abdin's pleading criticized CBS for dissecting his characters to their most generic components (e.g., "blond white male," "African-American female," "redhead" and "darker complexion" male) but Hwang notes those terms are the extent to which Abdin himself specifically described his own characters.
  
-==== "Random and Trivial Side-by-side Similarities" ====+==== 'Random and Trivial Side-by-side Similarities' ====
  
-**: What random similarities Abdin offers "scattered throughout [//Discovery// and Tardigrades]" are too superficial to qualify for copyright protection, Hwang writes:+What random similarities Abdin offers "scattered throughout [//Discovery// and Tardigrades]" are too superficial to qualify for copyright protection, Hwang writes:
  
----- +> Courts have found certain similarities to exist [with] portions of an allegedly infringing work, but nonetheless held that substantial similarity did not exist because of overwhelming dissimilarities in the works when compared in ‘total concept and overall feel.’
- +
-“Courts have found certain similarities to exist [with] portions of an allegedly infringing work, but nonetheless held that substantial similarity did not exist because of overwhelming dissimilarities in the works when compared in ‘total concept and overall feel.’” +
- +
-----+
  
 ===== Suing Netflix ===== ===== Suing Netflix =====